December 30, 2015 at 8:00 AM - Projects Committee Meeting
| Agenda |
|---|
|
1. SWCP
|
|
1.A. SWCP Application Approvals
Rationale:
None
|
|
1.B. SWCP Payments
Rationale:
14-TR-2 Dayle Alswager Terrace Repair $ 416.25 14-P-40 Jim Fehringer W/S Basin & Tile $ 12,500.00 $ 12,916.25
Recommended Motion(s):
*To approve two SWCP payments totaling $12,916.25 as shown in the Projects Committee Minutes Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
|
|
1.C. SWCP Cancellations
Rationale:
NONE
|
|
1.D. Cottonwood Creek Payments
Rationale:
NONE
|
|
1.E. Sand/Duck Creek Approvals
Rationale:
NONE
|
|
1.F. Sand/Duck Cost Share Payment
Rationale:
NONE
|
|
1.G. Wahoo Creek Cost Share Payments
Rationale:
Richard Cherovsky Terraces/Tile 10% $ 1,285.46 C&L Erickson LLC Lands for Cons. $ 6,402.00 C&L Erickson LLC #2 Lands for Cons. $ 7,867.20 $ 15,554.66
Recommended Motion(s):
*To approve the three Wahoo Creek Cost Share Payments totaling $15,554.66 as shown in the Projects Committee Minutes Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
|
|
1.H. Wahoo Creek Cost Share Approvals
|
|
2. WATERSHEDS
|
|
2.A. Shell Creek Watershed
|
|
2.A.1. Shell Creek Grant Payments
Rationale:
Attached is a cover crop payment request to Ryan Siefken for $788. Committee recommendation to make this payment is requested. It will be reimbursed 100% from NET grant funds.
Recommended Motion(s):
*To approve the $788 cover crop payment (78,8 acres) to Ryan Siefken as attached to the Projects Committee Minutes Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
()
|
|
2.B. Wahoo Creek Watershed - Water Quality Plan (PIP) Phase I
Rationale:
No new information to report as this time.
|
|
3. LOWER PLATTE RIVER CORRIDOR ALLIANCE
|
|
3.A. LPRCA Monthly Report
Rationale:
No new information to report. Meghan will have a written report by Board Meeting.
|
|
4. OTHER
|
|
4.A. Army COE 205 Projects
|
|
4.A.1. Fremont 205
Rationale:
The City of Fremont has been in discussion with NDOR about the differences in the hydraulic modeling between the COE and NDOR. The Corps has had discussion with NDOR about their preliminary road design. A meeting is being organized by the City and the Corps in which NDOR will be invited along with all partners. Heimann is also working on In-kind services the District has tallied the past 3 years. |
|
4.A.2. Schuyler 205
Rationale:
TCW the contractor continues to work on Jedlicka culverts and ramps near QC Supply.
|
|
4.B. Shell Creek Landowner Levee Project Update
Rationale:
No new information at this time.
|
|
4.C. All Hazard Mitigation Plan Update- JEO Progress Report and Invoice
Rationale:
No new information to report.
|
|
4.D. Review of Projects Financial Statement
|
|
4.E. Dennis Waak Dam Repair Assistance Request
Rationale:
Dennis and Karen Waak were present to discuss concerns about his private dam. Director Bailey presented some pictures to show the dam issues as attached, The vertical overflow tube is rusted through, causing the erosion. The concern is that the erosion will continue and ruin the horizontal drain tube as well. Their structure is close to the start of the Neiman ditch that goes along the north side of Schuyler and drains into it directly via county road ditches. The Waak's have hired an engineer to evaluate the structure damage and repair and has contacted some contractors for the possible repair. After more details are available, the Waak's will return to the Projects Committee to discuss possible assistance for their project.
Attachments:
()
|
|
4.F. Off Site Water Table Problems near Sand Creek Wetland
Rationale:
As earlier reported, for three years we have received comments on impacts to neighbors next to the Sand Creek Wetland. The Board voted to move forward with obtaining proposals from professionals to make an independent assessment of damages and we have received two for committee review and potential recommendation to hire one. The committee reviewed the proposals and discussed obtaining more detailed information pertaining to the landowner acres and tiling costs that might be involved to remedy the situation. After reviewing the two proposals the committee felt that we should return to our first approach to this problem and that is to meet with the individual landowners and ask what they felt it would take to make them whole, including the number of acres effected and the best solution. It appears that the cost to hire a consultant may approach 50% of the cost for a solution.
Recommended Motion(s):
To table a decision on the off site Water table Problems near the Sand Creek Wetland until more specific details are obtained to include total acres affected and costs to correct the situation Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
|
|
5. WESTERN SARPY/CLEAR CREEK LEVEE REPORT
Rationale:
Segment 4B A final inspection was held Gates are fixed Continue to monitor seeding establishment next spring Segment 5 Gates still needed to be installed All other work is conmplete |
|
6. ADJOURNMENT
Rationale:
With no further business, the Projects Committee adjourned at 9:13 a.m.
|
