April 12, 2021 at 6:00 PM - Regular Board of Directors Meeting
Agenda | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Call to Order
Rationale:
NOTE: The agenda is on file at the LPNNRD office and may be changed up to 24 hours prior to the meeting as scheduled.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.A. Meeting Notice
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.B. Inform Public on Location of Copy of “Open Meeting Act”
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.C. Pledge of Allegiance
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. Roll Call
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.A. Introductions
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. Approval of Agenda
Rationale:
Are there any additions or corrections to the agenda?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. Comments - Advisors/Guests
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.A. Guest Comments
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.B. NRCS Report
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.C. NARD Report
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.D. NRC Report
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.E. Managers Report
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.F. Education Program
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5. Approval of Minutes
Rationale:
Are there any additions or corrections to the Minutes? If not they will be approved on the consent agenda.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6. Report of Standing Committees
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A. Executive Committee - Action as Required
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.1. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.2. MEETINGS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.2.a. Pending
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.2.b. Reports
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.3. MANAGEMENT ITEMS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.3.a. Directors Absence
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.3.b. Monthly Education Program
Rationale:
Chris Poole has developed a PDF form for directors to complete their expense forms. Chris or staff would be available to give a quick review and explanation of how to complete this form.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.3.c. HBE360 Contract Renewal
Rationale:
Attached find a proposed engagement letter for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2022 and 2023. HBE360 has proposed a minor increase (3%), but as was the case with the last two-year agreement. We can lock in that rate for both years of the engagement rather than our typical annual adjustment. Most other items are similar to previous agreements, as no substantial nature or scope of the work was proposed to be changed.
Recommended Motion(s):
To authorize Manager Gottschalk to sign a two year (July 1, 2021 thru June 30, 2023) letter of engagement with HBE360 realizing a 3% increase. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.3.d. Director iPad Needs
Rationale:
Last month the decision was made to begin reimbursing all directors for use of their personal computers/notebooks. We now need to see if there is any director who does not own a personal computer so we can procure an ipad or tablet for them.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.3.e. Lake Wanahoo Developments
Rationale:
Discussion regarding potential developments on LPNNRD's Lake Wanahoo Property.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.3.f. LPNNRD Insurance Review
Rationale:
I have checked with 6 neighboring NRDs and it looks like there are two main companies covering those six...Inspro and Harry A. Koch (Cornerstone Insurance Company). Each of the districts I contacted used one of these two companies. I have reached out to LARM to get a definite answer from them whether we will have the option of staying with them and should have an answer by board meeting.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.3.g. 2021 Requirement to Re-District Due to 2020 Census
Rationale:
The final information obtained from the 2020 census is reported to be out and official by August/September. Because we are currently voting "At Large" the district boundaries are not quite as defined as if we were 1:1. We last re-districted in 2020 and it did affect a couple of our sub-district representatives.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.4. EQUIPMENT
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.4.a. Potential for FEMA Funding with 428 Funds
Rationale:
Chris Poole is looking into the potential of utilizing some of the FEMA 428 funds we have assigned for district equipment. Equipment would need to be purchased to assist with one of our projects damaged during the 2019 flood event. (Clear Creek or Wanahoo)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.5. PERSONNEL
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.6. FINANCE
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.6.a. Approval of Financial Reports
Rationale:
Grant will be available via conference call to review the February Financial Statements.
Recommended Motion(s):
To approve the February Financial Reports as presented Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.6.b. Approval of Managers Time and Expense Sheets
Rationale:
Attached find Gottschalk's time and expense sheets.
Recommended Motion(s):
Motion to approve Managers Time and Expense Sheets- Attachment Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.6.c. Accounts over 90 Days
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.A.6.d. Dodge County Farm Credit Leasing Service Correction
Rationale:
Information was received from the Dodge County Treasurer to inform us that a tax refund to Dodge County is needed. A tax roll correction was approve for Farm Credit Leasing Services. Dodge County is requesting $2,519.20 from the Lower Platte North NRD. The simplest method is to deduct these funds from our next payment from Dodge County. (see attachment)
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B. Operations Committee - Action as Required
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.1. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Rationale:
We have no unfinished business to attend to.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.2. WILD NE AND OTHER PROGRAMS
Rationale:
A prescribed burn for the Wanahoo Wildlife area in Section 15 is planned, weather permitting.
Heimann has reached out to the Big Game Conservation Group and the Wahoo Chapter of Ducks Unlimited asking if they would have some interest in a volunteer day to eradicate trees in certain areas. Scott Luedtke is exploring grant opportunities for tree removal on the Wanahoo areas. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.3. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE & OTHER ITEMS
Rationale:
The O & M crew burned large tree piles at Czechland Lake. Dam inspections after the recent rains. Equipment and vehicle maintenance gearing up for spring/summer. Assisted with a water line leak repair at the dump station. Continue to cut and treat trees on all our areas.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.3.a. Wanahoo Stilling Basin - (FEMA)
Rationale:
Valley Corp ran pumps to see if they could lower the water table enough for drawing down the stilling basin area safely for the welding of the gabion basket brackets. They were not successful enough to lower the water so, they are discussing alternate "B" Gabion Basket Connection (attached) of which will not be required to lower the water level as much. Discussion involves price. The District is monitoring the Lake level an attempting to get it down one foot and when the water isn't blowing over the weir Valley Corp will begin work on the baffles and then filters #1 and #2.
Attached is the third pay application which was sent too late for the previous Board meeting. We should expect pay application #4 before our April Board meeting.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.3.b. Western Sarpy Clear Creek O & M Manuals & Easements
Rationale:
The Clear Creek Levee O & M manual is still under review within the Corps of Engineers and between LPN and LPS NRD's. Staff has forwarded comments to the COE.
Heimann will register the Army's easement with the Register of Deeds after Board meeting. There is also an easement with the State of Nebraska, Dept. of Military, within Camp Ashland that was signed by the State but not by the NRD and it also has not been registered with the Deeds Office. Heimann has requested the State to research this. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.3.c. Conservation Trees
Rationale:
Currently the District has ordered 11,275 trees and of those 5,245 will be planted by the District for 12 cooperators.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.3.d. Haying on Recreational Grounds
Rationale:
Maps have been put together for haying lands at Czechland, Homestead and Lake Wanahoo. See the five attached maps.
We will advertise for three weeks, send packets to interested cooperators and open bids at our next Operations meeting April 29th.
Recommended Motion(s):
To advertise and accept bids for the haying of lands at Czechland, Homestead and Lake Wanahoo Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.3.e. Wahoo Creek Watershed Water Quality Plan Phase II (Czechland Lake)
Rationale:
We have been in contact with Mark Mainelli, Saunders County Engineer and acting Road Superintendent about completing the Czechland Lake Shoreline/Road Stabilization Project this summer. Saunders County is securing a 404 permit (attached) and will also contribute all engineering services. The total Project estimate is $299,103 (attached). The plan is that LPNNRD will provide the rip-rap and fabric ($231,955) and the County will provide engineering and do the construction work. We plan to use available EPA 319 and NET grant funding to assist with at least 60% of our expense.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.3.f. Nebraska Land Trust
Rationale:
The Nebraska Land Trust is an organization that secures conservation easements on properties throughout the State of Nebraska. The conservation easements protect lands in their natural state preserving them from future development.
David Sands is the administrator of the NE Land Trust and he operates under a Board of Directors (list attached) of many walks of life, agencies and organizations. Our District can have up to three people listed on the Board with only one of those individuals capable of voting at one time. Since John Hannah was not reelected and was a member of the NE Land Trust, would there be a current board member who would have interest in joining the NE Land Trust Board. Currently Nancy Meyer and Bob Heimann are listed members.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.4. ROCK AND JETTY
Rationale:
Dave Medinger in Butler County did some repair work on jetties last summer in which we assisted and plans to continue.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.5. LAKE WANAHOO
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.5.a. Lake Wanahoo Permit Sales
Rationale:
For the month of March, as of 3/31, the District has received $8,755.00 in annual permit revenue. The year by year comparison table is below.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.5.b. Lake Wanahoo Camping Revenue
Rationale:
As of 3/31, the District has received $1,290.50 in camping revenue.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.5.c. Lake Wanahoo Education Building
Rationale:
During the month of March, the building was rented 16 times. 2 NRD meetings, 1 youth event. Revenue for month of December: $900
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.5.d. General Lake Wanahoo Update
Rationale:
Staff has been working on getting the dump station operational after a line break was found below one of the flush out hydrants. Richard Mullen has returned from Arizona and will begin work on 4/1. Gottschalk and Schomer will be reviewing applications for summer Wanahoo Technicians. We only have one returning employee from last year. We are looking to replace the four past employees not returning as well as at least one person for the guard shack. The new trails have been mapped and work will begin at the start of April.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.6. INFORMATION AND EDUCATION
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.6.a. Information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.6.a.1. Radio & eAds
Rationale:
The KTIC ad and Wahoo Newspaper e-ad from March is attached. The ads promoted our tree sales
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.6.a.2. Analytics
Rationale:
LPNNRD Website: The same top 5 viewed pages remained the same in March. We continue to receive most of our traffic from internet searches with keywords: lower platte north nrd, lower platte north, lake wanahoo, wanahoo nrd, czechland and others. We are also receiving traffic from outdoornebraska.org, nrdnet.org, visitnebraska.com, wahoo-ashland-waverly.com and other sites. There were 50 clicks to our site from Facebook and 3 from Twitter.
LPNNRD Facebook: Our top Facebook posts included: docks are back in at Czechland Lake and Lake Wanahoo, press release and information about the new educational series "Coffee, Lakeside"
LPNNRD Twitter: Our top posts included information about the first Coffee, Lakeside event; limited availablity remaining for tree and shrub orders; docks are back in at Czechland Lake and Lake Wanahoo.
As a reminder, please Like and Share our Facebook and Twitter posts if you have an account - this helps us to reach more people! |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.6.a.3. Advertising with News Channel Nebraska
Rationale:
Last year we shared the Lake Wanahoo video during the start of the pandemic with News Channel Nebraska and had a great response! This year we have two new videos (Projects video, Operations and Maintenance video) that we would like to share with News Channel Nebraska.
Attached is the coverage map for News Channel Nebraska and it can also be downloaded through streaming devices. The rates (same as last year) for running the videos are also attached: News - $475 per month Ag - $400 per month
Recommended Motion(s):
To approve three months of advertising LPNNRD 30-second video with News Channel Nebraska for the "News" section at $475 per month totaling $1,425 Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.6.b. Education
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.6.b.1. Education Programs
Rationale:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.6.b.2. Shell Creek Watershed Scholarship Applicant
Rationale:
We received one scholarship applicant this year - Emma Montoya. Her information is attached. She has met the qualifications. To qualify for the scholarship, applicants must:
Recommended Motion(s):
To reward Emma Montoya with a $1,000 Shell Creek Watershed Scholarship Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.6.b.3. Envirothon
Rationale:
The Nebraska State Envirothon Contest will be held at Lake Wanahoo on April 28th.
The NCF-Envirothon has decided to make the contest virtual in the last week of July. We will not need any volunteers for this. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.7. RURAL WATER SYSTEMS
Rationale:
DHHS released the 2020 water quality reports for our Colon and Bruno RWDs. Reports will be posted to our website and at local post offices.
Elliott and Benal attended the Nebraska Rural Water Conference in Kearney March 15-16. Both acquired enough hours to renew their Grade 4 water operator licenses. Major topic was the new lead and copper rules going into effect; Colon and Bruno RWDs shouldn't see any big effects, but many water utilities are going to see significant impacts due to increasing lead restrictions and reporting requirements. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.7.a. Colon System
Rationale:
New water rates take effect with this month's (March) bills.
JEO submitted a cost estimate (attached) for new development in Colon; the Colon RWD will cover costs of engineering, and DHHS review. Meters read, bills in the mail, and routine monthly sampling completed.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.7.b. Bruno System
Rationale:
The new 2" service connection at the Waste Connection Landfill should be completed by 4/2. M.E. Collins has been contracted for the labor.
Meters read, bills in the mail, and routine monthly sampling completed. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.B.7.c. Other
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C. Water Committee - Action as Required
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.1. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Rationale:
To table flow meter discussion until February Water Committee, so Committee could know if grant funding would be available.
Update: January 22, 2021 The NET Grant submitted by LPN didn't score high enough for it to be on the recommended funding list for 2021. After agenda item was taken from the table, staff showed the list of projects approved by Nebraska Environmental Trust and how this project scored compared to others. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.2. REGULATORY
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.2.a. GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT AREA
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.2.a.1. Well Permit Program
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.2.a.2. METOs Equipment
Rationale:
Staff has been working with Derek Brazada from the METOs company on setting up weather stations and water level locations for remote read. Derek attended the Water Committee to explain the information that is shown on these sites. Staff will be installing one site with a conversion kit from the McCrometer Company to do remote reads on a mechanical flow meter.
Attachment shows the cost of this equipment.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.2.a.3. Water Use Reports and Flow Meters
Rationale:
Staff has been in contact with producers/owners on installing a required flow meter by March 26, 2021. All producers has told staff that they are working on installing a flow meter before irrigation. Staff will continue to stay in contact with these individuals and will report to the Committee, if other actions will need to be taken.
Information from 2020 meter reports.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.2.a.4. Lower Platte River Basin Water Management Plan Coalition (LPRBC)
Rationale:
The technical and management groups have met in the last months reviewing next year budget, yearly IMP reports and contract for analyzing the next 5-year increments The Coalition Directors meeting will be held April 27 (virtual and in-person) at Lower Loup NRD starting at 11 am. The directors will be voting on the items described. Attached for review is the draft budget and contract along with the submitted LPN V-IMP report. The cost of both of these contracts are $129,500, which will be part of the Coalition budget.
LPN Water Committee wants to emphasis that recharge need to be accurately represented and after adding extra acres over the last 4 years, water levels have remained relatively unchanged.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.2.a.5. LPNNRD Operator Certification
Rationale:
Updated 3/31/2021 - 8 more producers have passed the online test and 2 others have passed the take-home test.
Class Attendance for 2021:
Of these 17 were "New" (first-timers) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.3. GROUND WATER PROGRAMS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.3.a. DECOMMISSIONED WELL PROGRAM
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.3.a.1. Well Estimates
Rationale:
3 new wells has been reviewed and approved for decommissioning since the last Committee meeting.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.3.a.2. Plugged Wells
Rationale:
# wells have been plugged, reviewed, and ready for cost share payment approval this month.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.3.b. LOWER PLATTE NORTH NRD GROUND WATER STUDIES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.3.b.1. Phase Area Update
Rationale:
Staff had discussion on demonstration fields for 2021 in the nitrate areas. Some of the ideas were nitrogen modeling software comparison, inhibitors and nitrogen test strips. UNL on-farm research is looking for fields to study these ideas with funding available for participating producers.
Part of the NET Grant is to purchase Field Equipment to test for PH, Dissolved Oxygen, Conductivity and other parameters prior to collecting a water sample. More information is attached, with staff looking at purchasing 3 water sampling meters. The Grant will be paying $5,500, with the other portion used as NRD match. Quotes: Oakton PCD 659 - $3010.51 Xylem/YSI ProDSS - $5,629.00 ProQuatro - $2,957.00 Hach HQ2100 - $2,606.22 HQ4300 - $3,203.20 Staff explained the differences of each meter with the higher cost due to the dissolve oxygen probe. Dissolve oxygen (DO) helps in determining if an aquifer is anaerobic or aerobic. This information is valuable in determining the movement of contaminants like nitrates, iron and manganese, that will react differently when a certain level of oxygen is present. The equipment staff uses now, does not have a DO probe and is about 10 years old. Attached is an updated quote for the ProQuatro equipment from YSI Inc. The cost per meter will be $2878.18 per meter for a total cost of $8,634.55, plus estimated shipping of $10.
Recommended Motion(s):
Recommend to accept the bid for three (3) ProQuatro handheld water meter sensors from YSI Inc. not to exceed $2,957 a piece with additional discounts with trade-in for the old equipment. . Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.3.b.2. NEW MONITORING WELLS
Rationale:
Updated information on the test holes and monitoring wells. UNL/CSD can do the test holes as shown by the schedule below.
Staff is working on obtaining permission from land owners for test holes on the first 2 sites, with the plan to send RFPs on a monitoring well in the Richland Area.
Recommended Motion(s):
Recommend to contract with UNL/CSD for 3 test holes per current UNL/LPN Cooperative Agreement. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.3.b.3. Phoenix WebGroup
Rationale:
This was the first year that the NRD offered online reporting for meter and nitrogen reports. Staff was overall satisfied on how this process worked with 29% of the water use reports submitted online and 38% of the nitrogen reports. Some of the producers recommended a few changes to make this process easier. Changes for the online site include:
Recommended Motion(s):
Recommend to approve Phoenix Webgroup work order updates for $18,775 with 50% deposit in this fiscal year, with remaining amount in next fiscal year and to commit to the Silver Support Plan for $2,500. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.3.b.4. Cost Share Programs
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.3.b.4.A. Cost-share Projects
Rationale:
Does the Water Committee want to consider items to encourage producers to improve their management?
Committee and staff discussed the items shown below, with Mark Walkenhorst from NRCS available for questions. It was explained that the RCPP grant is designed for designated areas, which would emphasis certain practices to solve the identified problems. It was pointed out that some of the most successful programs utilize staff that could work one-on-one with producers. This individual would set up management strategies with producers and then apply for funding to implement the BMPs. Increasing education in the nitrate management areas need to be a priority utilizing all avenues and working with UNMC on the health aspects. Committee discussed the ranking criteria on smaller fields that sometime can't get funding but still contributes to the problem. The grant should consider doing a few BMPs well, than trying to do many average. Committee and staff will continue to discuss with more detailed information at the next Water Committee Meeting. Discussion Items:
SDI - $740.64/ac. for General Signup. Nitrate Areas (not specific to high nitrate areas) but for source water areas which often include high nitrate areas it is 1058.05/ac. The EQIP - General HU of 1269.66 would apply to Historically Underserved clients (Beginning farmers, etc.). Applications for microirrigation (SDI) must meet the irrigation history for two of five years and must not exceed the 5% threshold of newly irrigated acres on the entire system. An application for microirrigation (SDI) would be considered ineligible even if the applicant is willing to pay for those additional acres (greater than the 5% incidental acres allowed) without cost assistance. Pivot cost-share is $18.97 per linear feet. Can the NRD put another $5,000 - $10,000 on top of the EQIP payment? To my knowledge "yes". May be a stipulation that the cost share (incentive) cannot exceed 100% of the cost. Will need to get this checked. Would a product like SoyGreen for soybeans be eligible for cost share to decrease PH to encourage a crop rotation in high nitrate areas? I do not know, it would depend if that product meets NRCS tech guide. Would there be any incentive for a 3 crop rotation? Yes, we currently have an incentive to encourage a more diverse crop rotation. With RCPP, we do have flexibilities that EQIP does not. For example, if a project proposes to pay a higher rate than EQIP for established conservation practices, that is OK (as long as defined in the final agreement and is equitable). But it cannot exceed 100% of the cost rate. Please keep in mind that RCPP proposals where the partner provides more % of FA (preferably cash) typically score better than those who do not. LPN collected this information during the process of certifying irrigated acres.
Surface Irrigation - 4,269.19 acres, Commingled Acres of GW and SW - 5,117.56 acres. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.4. SURFACE WATER PROGRAMS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.5. OTHER
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.C.5.a. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D. Projects Committee - Action as Required
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.1. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Rationale:
No unfinished business to address.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.2. SWCP
Rationale:
Attached is the 2021 SWCP policy with prior approved Lands For Conservation revision.
DNR reallocated returned SWCP funds to each NRD in the amount of $1,887.51.
Recommended Motion(s):
To approve the 2021 SWCP policy as attached to the Projects Committee Minutes Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.2.a. SWCP Application Approvals
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.2.b. SWCP Payments
Rationale:
Recommended Motion(s):
To approve SWCP payment to Norm Lindgren for $2,045.76 Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.2.c. SWCP Cancellations
Rationale:
None
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.2.d. Wahoo Creek Cost Share Approvals
Rationale:
None
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.2.e. 2021 Tree Planting Cost-Share
Rationale:
Attached is the 2021 Tree Cost Share applicant list. There are six separate applicants for a total of 3,354 trees with NRD's 75% cost share totaling $5,031.
Recommended Motion(s):
To approve the six 2021 tree planting applications for 75% LPNNRD cost share, totaling $5,031, as attached to the Projects Committee Minutes Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.3. WATERSHEDS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.3.a. Shell Creek
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.3.a.1. Shell Creek Environmental Enhancement Plan Implementation
Rationale:
No new updates. Last month, JEO was approved to update the Shell Creek Watershed Water Quality Plan and they have started this effort.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.3.a.1.A. Shell Creek Grant Funding Update
Rationale:
No new information to report since last month.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.3.a.2. Shell Creek Environmental Enhancement Plan Payment
Rationale:
Septic System upgrade -
Recommended Motion(s):
To approve septic system upgrade payment to James Brock for $4,800. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.3.b. Wahoo Creek Watershed
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.3.b.1. Wahoo Creek Dam Site Planning Update & FYRA Invoices
Rationale:
NRCS investigated Wahoo Creek Dam Site 83 for evidence of additional archeological findings on March 30 & 31. FYRA has calculated economics based on 11 dam sites, including Site 83, and is waiting to finalize things until NRCS makes a determination regarding the site. An addtional ancent earth lodge was verified in an area that appears would be covered with prement water from the proposed dam. NRCS will complete a formal report on their discoveries, including impacts and potential options to continue with keeping the dam site in the watershed plan. Our plan to have NRCS present this information at the next Projects Committee Meeting and at the May 10th Board Meeting.
Attached is FYRA's $6,863.75 invoice for work completed on the Wahoo Creek Watershed Plan. After this payment, $17,886.25 will remain on our $95,469 contract addendum. Janel Kaufman, FYRA, reports that during the invoice period, they finished up the economics modeling, worked on bridge/road benefits, and consulted with NRCS. They are finalizing the economics and Plan and are waiting on any additional costs on Site 83. Mike Sotak, FYRA, has outlined two paths moving forward:
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.3.b.2. Wahoo Creek Watershed Water Quality Plan Phase II
Rationale:
We have been in contact with Mark Mainelli, Saunders County Engineer and acting Road Superintendent about completing the Czechland Lake Shoreline/Road Stabilization Project this summer. Saunders County is securing a 404 permit (attached) and will also contribute all engineering services. The total Project estimate is $299,103 (attached). The plan is that LPNNRD will provide the rip-rap and fabric ($231,955) and the County will provide the engineering service and construction work. We plan to use available EPA 319 and NET grant funding to assist with at least 60% of LPNNRD expense.
As approved by the Board last month, JEO is working to update the Wahoo Creek Watershed Water Quality Plan.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.3.b.3. Olsson Design Update and Invoice
Rationale:
No new update. As mentioned previously, Olsson is on hold completing any additional dam design work until the Wahoo Creek Watershed Plan is approved. On March 23, Gottschalk and Mountford met with Andrew Phillips and Joshua Shackelford, Olsson PE. Shackelford works out of the Olsson Denver Office and will be assisting with quality control on the Wahoo Creek Dam designs.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.3.b.4. Lands For Conservation
Rationale:
PARTICIPANT ACRES
Recommended Motion(s):
To approve 2021 LFC applications to listed applicants totaling $32,185.00. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.4. Nebraska Buffer Strip Program Contract Approvals
Rationale:
The following NeBSP applications have been reviewed by NRCS, NeDA, and NRD staff and are ready for approval:
Total acres = 61.42 Total NeBSP payments = $13,672.85
Recommended Motion(s):
To approve seven new NeBSP contract applicants, for a total $13,672.85 and 61.42 acres, as listed in the Projects Committee Minutes Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.5. JOINT WATER MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD
Rationale:
No new updates from last month. It is anticipated that this spring and summer we will be working closely with JWMAG partners on our several joint projects. Director Thompson said that he listened in at the last Fremont City Council Meeting and commented that the general public in Fremont is becoming very aware of the many projects and overall efforts JWMAG partners are involveled with to reduce flood impacts to community.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.6. HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE
Rationale:
No new updates.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.7. EROSION AND SEDIMENT RULES AND REGULATIONS
Rationale:
No new issues to address.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.8. OTHER
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.8.a. Woodcliff (SID No.8) FEMA 406 Bank Stabilization Project JEO Update/Request
Rationale:
Jake Miriovsky, JEO, attended and Lonnie Mart, SID No. 8. participated (Zoom) on the progress report on the Wooddcliff (SID No. 8) FEMA 406 Bank Stabilization Project. The 404 permit has been received from USACE and they are in the process of obtaining a permit from County Zoning. SID No. 8 is advertizing for bids and is planning to award a construction bid in May. While LPNNRD has not yet made a formal commitment on this portion of the project, it was indicated previously that assistance would be considered as long as LPNNRD is kept informed on the process and a formal assistance request is presented prior to project construction. The project estimate (@ $692,000) has been approved for 87.5% from FEMA (75%) and NEMA (12.5%). SID No. is requesting 50% LPNNRD assistance on the 12.5% total estimated local share of $80,000. .
Attached are the project plans and information provided at the Decemeber 3, 2020, Projects Committee meeting. As addtional information, Jake Miriovsky reported on another repair project of the Levee/Road that was not part of the orginal project stabilization project. It has been discovered that significant erosion on 400 feet of the embankment has occured. This is considered an emergency repair roughly estimated at $275,000 - $300,000 at this time. SID No. 8 will present a formal asssitance request for this project repair after more details are finalized.
Recommended Motion(s):
To approve 50%, up to a maximum of $40,000 assistance, toward the local share for completion of the FEMA 406 Mitigation Bank Stabilization Project Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.D.8.b. Schuyler Flood Risk Reduction/Drainage Improvement Project Assistance Request
Rationale:
As attached, the City of Schuyler is submitting a formal assistance request on their flood risk reduction drainage improvement project. This project was previously discussed with the Projects Committee last month. The total project request involves placing three additional flap gate closure structures on storm sewer outfalls to Lost Creek and channel widening in the southeast part of the city. The gates are to prevent floodwater backflow into the City. Schuyler is requesting LPNNRD 50% assistance on the $312,000 estimated project costs ($156,000), as attached. Kevin Kruse, JEO, and City of Schuyler Administrator William Re Roos, were joined by Zoom to discuss their request. The committee will consider this request after having more time to review the project components. Also attached is Schuyler's Internal Drainage Study Report.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7. Additional Action Items
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.A. Well Permit
Rationale:
Attached is the well permit and drawing of irrigated acres with well locations. This permit came in after the Committee meeting and the producer is wanting to drill ASAP. The reason for the changes is Hwy 30 will be dividing up the current irrigated acres. They would like one new well permit to go with 3 replacement well permits. The new well will allow them not to run a pipeline over to the pivot in the NE¼ 3-17N-8E. They will be reducing certified irrigated acres by 40 - 50 acres and would like the right to reserve the acres for south of the highway after construction.
A motion will be needed to approve the McKnight Well Permit application as attached.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.B. Wahoo Creek Lands for Conservation Application
Rationale:
Geroge Cejka - 13 Acres - $2,665.00
A motion will be needed. To approve Geroge Cejka Wahoo Creek Lands for Conservation application for 13 acres in the amount of $2,665 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8. Approval of Bills Pending
Recommended Motion(s):
Motion to approve bills pending as presented Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9. Consent Agenda Adoption
Recommended Motion(s):
Motion to approve Consent Agenda as presented Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10. Comments from Directors/Guests
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11. Meeting Establishment/Adjournment
Rationale:
NOTE: The agenda is on file at the LPNNRD office and may be changed up to 24 hours prior to the meeting as scheduled. |