February 1, 2022 at 6:00 PM - Water Committee Meeting
Agenda | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. USGS STREAM FLOW GAUGING SITES
Rationale:
Matt Moser from USGS presented to the Committee on the Leahara water quality gage and streamgages located on Shell Creek, Wahoo Creek, along with a dedicated GW monitoring well. Matt will be at the Board Meeting on February 10th to update the full Board.
The USGS and LPN have partnered for numerous years on streamgages and GW monitoring well. The cost for these sites is $34,265 with LPN share $17,635. LPN has partnered with LPSNRD, Papio NRD, M.U.D, LWS and USGS for 6 years in collecting water quality information. The purpose of this site is outlined in the attachment "Leshara Qualiy Gage at Leshara" under bullet 2. This group is proposing an additional 3 years,with LPN shares as follows: Year 1 (FY23) - $6,400; Year 2 (FY24) - $5,320; Year 3 (FY25) - $4,360
Recommended Motion(s):
Recommend to continue the joint funding agreement 22NRJFA00170 with USGS and have Board Chairman sign for streamgages on Shell Creek and Wahoo Creek and one real-time groundwater level monitoring site until September 30, 2022 with the amount of $17,635 authorized for FY22-23 budget. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Recommended Motion(s) #2:
Recommend to approve and have Board Chainman sign the joint funding agreement for real-time continuous water quality monitoring in Lower Platte River at Leshara for 3 years. Lower Platte North NRD share will be $6,400 in FY23, $5,320 (FY24) and $4,360 (FY25). Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. REGULATORY
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.A. GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT AREA
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.A.1. Well Permit Program
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.A.1.a. Duane Johnson Well Permit Application
Rationale:
Duane Johnson has submitted an application to drill a new well in the NW1/4 S14-T15N-R8E, Saunders County. This well will irrigate ~55 certified irrigated acres that are currently serviced from well G-004921, located in the SW1/4 of the same section. Attached is a map of the section and the surrounding area, as well as AEM profiles flown through the section.
Committee and staff discussed that the second well potentially could make Duane more efficient, as the original well would not run 7 days a week. It was suggested that a test hole be drilled as the AEM flight results show where aquifer bearing material could be limited. Also added is a Geo-physiclal E-log for a well being proposed by Duane Johonson south of Ithaca. The e-log was discussed and the concern that when pumping occurs, would salt begin to expand into the aquifer? Duane plans on installing a monitoring well to collect water samples.
Recommended Motion(s):
Recommend approving the well permit application for Duane Johnson in the NW1/4 S14-T15N-R8E with no increase irrigation acres, for more efficient irrigation management. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.A.1.b. Lyle Alswager Well Permit Application
Rationale:
Lyle Alswager has submitted an application to drill a new irrigation well in the SE1/4 NE1/4 S1-T18N-R1W, Platte County, SQS #2. The well will irrigate 121 certified irrigated acres that are currently serviced from well G-073135 located in the NW1/4 of the same section. Attached are two AEM profiles that were flown over the proposed well location, as well as a three-dimensional view of SQS #2.
Well G-073135 is irrigating 2 pivots on 244 acres and has used 7.45 inches/acre over the last 2 years. Committee and staff discussed the efficiency side of 1 well, handling 2 pivots and trying to get over all of the acres in a 1 week's time. The committee reviewed the amount of water used over the last 2 years and commented on the producer's efficiency. The AEM flights show that this area has a better aquifer than other parts of the SQS #2 area. The committee wanted to make sure no increase in acres would occur and allow this because of family estate planning. As per LPNNRD Ground Water Rules and Regulations Section U, Rule 2.1, a good cause variance can be allowed if a producer provides written documentation to justify approving the variance.
Recommended Motion(s):
To approve the well permit (as per LPNNRD Ground Water Rules and Regulations Section U, Rule 2.1 as a good cause variance) for Lyle Alswager for SE¼-NE¼-S1-T18N-R1W, Platte County, SQS #2. The well permit is approved with the understanding of no increase of irrigated acres but potentially more efficient irrigation management. The new well would have the established irrigation SQS #2 allocation but would take into account the previous 2 years of water use from original well. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.A.1.c. 2021 Approved Well Permit Summary
Rationale:
Location of Approved Well Permits for 2021
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.A.2. CERTIFIED IRRIGATED ACRES TRANSFER POLICY
Rationale:
Staff has attached a draft policy for discussion. (Updated Number 5 from Committee Meeting). The last 3 pages are the application forms.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.A.3. Variance Scoring Sheet
Rationale:
The staff is working on a draft for review.
Committee and staff discussed the logistics of adding best management practices into the scoring system. The issue is enforcement of the variance conditions in future years. Staff will continue to evaluate the point systems on new wells and expansion of acres. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.A.4. LPNNRD Operator Certification
Rationale:
Upcoming Classes
Feb 3 - Wahoo at 10 am Feb 7 - Lindsay at 1 pm Feb 15 - David City at 9:30 am Feb 24 - Columbus at 10 am |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.A.5. Lower Platte River Basin Water Management Plan Coalition (LPRBC)
Rationale:
John Engel from HDR made a presentation to the Board in January. Attached are the recommended numbers for the next 5 years.
The proposal that is presently being discussed is a 25-year analysis, which would allow LPN 2,759 for the next 5 years. The previous allotment was 2,276, which the LPN will carry over 982 AF from the previous 5 years. That will allow 3,941 new AF+Carryover from 2022 thru 2026. The Coalition Board, of which Bob Hilger is LPN representative, will be meeting in April. Committee discussed municipal and industrial use and how it is reported to the Coalition. They also discussed whether the District is too conservative about the amount of allotment allowed per year. At the present time, the District allows 200 Acre Feet of new water use for irrigated acres.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.A.6. Flow Meter Program
Rationale:
The staff has been receiving calls from producers on meters that don't consistently work. Two meters that have been a problem are GrowSmart and Senninger. The staff plans on presenting a new approved meter list at the March Committee Meeting.
Another issue is timely water use reports. Would the Committee consider that after 45 days from the reporting deadline, staff would read the producer's meter but charge them $50? As of today (2/1/2022), the district has recorded 1,149 meter readings. Out of the 1,149 meter readings recorded,1,023 are irrigation wells. There are around 40 irrigation meter readings that have not been recorded yet. The deadline for reporting meter readings is December 15th. Out of the 1,149 meter readings that have been recorded, 247 came in from December 16th-30th and around 260 were reported after January 1st. So just over half are reporting by the deadline. Should we look into a better way of contacting the producers for this information, such as text alerts? Just looking to improve our communication with producers and patrons of our district. Any discussion? Attached is the invoice for $12,980.00 from Tri City for performing their routine maintenance on the flow meters within Zone 2 of the LPNNRD District. 213 flow meters were maintained in late November-early December. Out of the 213 meters maintained, 211 of those were mechanical meters and two others were electronic meters. The battery changes are also included on the invoice, which in turn gets billed to the producer for those battery changes for reimbursement to the LPNNRD. There were 5-10 that needed repair beyond the regular maintenance. The extra meter repair billings is handled directly between the producer and Tri City if they so choose to have them do the repairs. The producers with the extra repairs have all been contacted and are allowing Tri City to do the repairs. Tri city also has their contact information.
Recommended Motion(s):
To approve the $12,980.00 payment to Tri City Meters for their contracted flow meter. maintenance work Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. GROUND WATER PROGRAMS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.A. DECOMMISSIONED WELL PROGRAM
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.A.1. Well Estimates
Rationale:
# new wells has been reviewed and approved for decommissioning since the last Committee meeting.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.A.2. Plugged Wells
Rationale:
Two (2) wells have been plugged, reviewed, and ready for cost share payment approval this month.
Recommended Motion(s):
Recommend paying well decommissioning cost-share to Justin Krafka for $1,000 and Kerry Knuth for $968.18. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.B. LOWER PLATTE NORTH NRD GROUND WATER STUDIES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.B.1. Phase Area Update
Rationale:
A producer within the Schulyer-Richard Nitrogen Management Area was wondering about cost-share on iron chlorosis chemistry on soybean for 120 acres of soybeans. At the present time, the NRD still has $3,000 left on the NET grant for demonstration fields. Is this an item that the NRD wants to cost-share in the future? Other items that should be considered for future cost-share?
Committee discussed that if this practice encourages corn-soybean crop rotation, it will decrease the amount of nitrogen fertilizer applied. The area around Richland-Schulyer is a challenge for growing soybeans because of higher ph and iron levels. They asked staff to work with the producer to set up a demonstration field for this product. If the NRD is interested in working with the NRCS, the RCPP grant deadline is coming up on April 13. A survey that was conducted by staff at the online meetings is attached. Staff went over the survey from meetings held in November and December. They directed staff to investigate an RCPP grant with NRCS with the practices identified in the survey. Attached is a study conducted by Lower Loup NRD on age dating the water, which can assist in nitrogen loading and management. LLNRD has asked if LPN is interested in doing a similar study from Columbus to Fremont. USGS is obtaining a price for this study and then the NRDs could jointly apply for a grant.
Recommended Motion(s):
Recommend to approve a cost-share incentive for iron chlorosis chemistry on soybean at $15/acre, with total cost-share fund limited to $3,000 for the current fiscal year. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.B.2. Eastern Nebraska Water Resources Assessment (ENWRA)
Rationale:
ENRWA long range plans are shown below along with an attachment of area of interest for recharge projects. ENWRA agreement ends in June and wanting to extend this for another 5 years. Katie Cameron will be at the March 1st Water Committee Meeting.
Long Range Plan related: We have mapped like $10 Million of priority areas with AEM projects for the ENWRA area using ENWRA as a vehicle for grants and cooperation while spending in an efficient manner because of good planning and pooling funds and resources (CSD/USGS/DNR partners) so a high quality framework is mostly built now (not just AEM but all existing studies are part of the framework, there are some remaining infills still needed in places too - reference Word doc of LPN related Dropbox folder links attached too). , the water budget would be the next goal to focus on but regional water budget very long term but maybe we can use ENWRA to get at complexities encountered by the current model work and/or help build NRD scale water budget components (water budget pilot areas to identify for each NRD? To see how DNR LPMT model and/or your geologic models did with incorporating the AEM). Here is what we had from the last Long Range Plan update meeting in Dec. 2019 (dated Mar 2020):
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.B.3. GMDA Winter Conference 2022
Rationale:
Attached is a report from the conference.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5. OTHER
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5.A. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC
|