March 31, 2022 at 7:30 AM - Projects Committee Meeting
Agenda | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Rationale:
None
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. SWCP
Rationale:
We currently have $54,540.06 of state allocated SWCP funds remaining for FY22 of the original $85,024.81 allotment. We have until 7/31/22 to disburse them or they will be rolled over to next year's allocation.
Attached is the 2022 SWCP policy for official approval. Bob Heimann will be present to discuss a proposed change to our Tree Cost-Share program to allow cost share in some instances when trees are planted by the cooperator. Attached is the proposed tree cost share list. The first 4 will be planted by the District. Chromy is doing his own with our rental tree planter. Bob thought maybe cost share on hand plants 600 or greater at 50%. Ex: 600 x $2= 1,200 if we plant them, their cost 25% = $300. If they hand plant, 600 x $1 =600 at 50% = $300. So it’s no more or less. The only other update to the policy is our 2022 Lands For Conservation program.
Recommended Motion(s):
To include tree handplants as an eligible high priority practice under our Soil and Water Conservation Program, at 50% cost share assistance on handplanting of 600 or more trees, provided that the cooperator uses our tree planning machine. It is further recommended that final approved payments will be subject to LPNNRD inspection Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Recommended Motion(s) #2:
To approve 2022 SWCP policy with amendments/updates as attached to the Projects Committee Minutes Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.A. SWCP Application Approvals
Rationale:
Heimann submitted the applications he's received for this year's tree plantings. They are listed below:
Waiting for our summer applications from NRCS.
Recommended Motion(s):
To approve the five listed SWCP Tree Planting Cost-Share applications totaling $4,232.50 Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.B. SWCP Payments
Rationale:
None
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.C. SWCP Cancellations
Rationale:
None
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.D. Wahoo Creek Cost Share Approvals
Rationale:
None
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. WATERSHEDS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.A. Shell Creek
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.A.1. Shell Creek Environmental Enhancement Plan Implementation
Rationale:
The earth work on South Shell Creek Channel Improvement/Benching Project has been completed. Colfax County is working with the contractor and will invoice us for the completed work. We will be reimbursed for the majority of this expense from approved grant funds. The county is also working on a couple of smaller channel stabilization projects that might be completed by July 1, 2022. Bill Bos continues to work on landowner conservation projects and septic system upgrades.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.A.1.a. Tom Sprunk Bank Stabilization/Wetlands Project
Rationale:
Tom Sprunk continues to work with NRCS and a local contractor on preliminary design and costs for one or two additional stabilization projects on his property on Shell Creek tributaries. These proposals are anticipated soon.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.A.1.b. Shell Creek Grant Funding Update
Rationale:
We will be using up to approximately $290,000 of grant funding to help complete various Shell Creek projects by July 1, 2022. We also have budgeted $100,000 of local LPNNRD funds to assist as well. Mountford met with Bill Bos, our Shell Creek Watershed Technician, to estimate the various projects that could occur:
Completion of the Shell Creek Channel Improvement/Benching Project ($150,000 - $200,000); Tom Sprunk Grade Stabilization Project $50,000, Various landowner projects ($50,000). Colfax County Stabilization projects ($100,000). While these are rough estimates, it appears we would have enough total funding to participate in these projects if everything falls into place. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.A.1.c. Shell Creek Septic System upgrade application
Rationale:
We received an application for a septic system upgrade within the Shell Creek Environmental Enhancement plan watershed, estimated 60% cost-share rate:
Recommended Motion(s):
To approve Kevin Veeder's septic system upgrade application (60% up to $6,000) within the Shell Creek Environmental Enhancement Plan Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.B. Wahoo Creek Watershed
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.B.1. Wahoo Creek Dam Site Planning Update & FYRA Invoices
Rationale:
We are still awaiting final NRCS approval of our Wahoo Creek Watershed Plan, but anticipate that approval soon. The final draft plan can be viewed at:
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/ne/technical/engineering/?cid=nrcseprd1492259 We have received a $3,870 invoice from FYRA for their work with NRCS and involvement with our public meeting. During this invoice period, they reviewed agency comments and developed reply letters, updated the Plan-EA with information from those comments, attended the projects committee meeting, and reviewed comments from Headquarters. After this payment, $2,187.75 will remain unpaid on the $740,763 FYRA contract. We will report on the outcome of the Wahoo Creek Public information meeting held Monday, March 28th (Agenda attached). There was a good turnout for the meeting with approximately fifty people in attendance, the majority being landowners and tenants affected by the dam sites.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.B.2. Olsson Design Update and Invoice
Rationale:
Attached is the March 22, 2022, progress report and invoice from Olsson totaling $75,985.19. This invoice is for geo-tech activities at Wahoo Creek dam sites 55, 66, 77, 82, 84, 85 and 86. After this payment, $1,482,124.02 will remain under contract.
As mentioned under the Wahoo Creek Planning agenda item above, an update was given about the outcome of our March 28th public meeting on LPNNRD moving forward with the process to complete our ten watershed reduction dams by December, 2026. Andrew Phillips, Olsson, said that hydraulics and hydrology have been started on sites 26a, 26b & 27. Olsson has also had an initial meeting with the USACE on 404 permitting for the dams.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.B.3. Wahoo Creek Watershed Water Quality Plan Phase II
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3.B.4. Wahoo Creek Addtional Watershed Assistance Discussion
Rationale:
As we start looking ahead to completing 10 dams by the end of 2026, there will be an accelerated workload that will require additional internal or external assistance. Besides coordination with our engineer firm and the construction contractor, there will be a lot of involvement with landowners, particularly securing project land rights. We anticipate over 70 landowners who we will be negotiating easements and this could be a very time-consuming process. Besides adding an additional staff member, there would be an opportunity to hire outside land rights assistance during the appraisal process. The committee started this discussion which will continue at future meetings.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. JOINT WATER MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.A. Elkhorn Township/Fremont East Project Meeting
Rationale:
A report will be given on the outcome of a March 28th partner meeting with JEO to review project options for drainage improvement east of Fremont. Attached is the Agenda along with options that were discussed at that meeting. While everything is still in the very early planning phase, it appears the best path going forward will be to combine alternatives as presented on Agenda No. 6. showing flood reduction within Fremont and on agricultural land east of the city (refer to Working Alterative - 5 Year Storm Map).
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4.B. Rawhide Creek Work Plan-Environmental Assessment Update
Rationale:
An update will be given on the Rawhide Creek Planning effort. Attached is the agenda and the first three chapters of the draft Rawhide Creek Watershed Plan sections for your review.
Attachments:
(
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5. EROSION AND SEDIMENT RULES AND REGULATIONS
Rationale:
No new information to discuss.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6. OTHER
Rationale:
None
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7. ADJOURNMENT
Rationale:
The Projects Committee Adjourned at 8:33 a.m.
|