April 2, 2026 at 9:30 AM - Water Committee Meeting
| Agenda | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2. REGULATORY
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2.A. GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT AREA
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2.A.1. Transfer Request in the Hydrologically Connected Area (Limited Development Area)
Rationale:
Taylor Farms is requesting to transfer 15 acres from NW NW 12-17-5E to SE S12-17-7E. These sites are located in Dodge County between North Bend and Fremont.
Staff explained that there would be a gain in acre feet of water, which is part of the 5-year allotment with the Coalition. Maps are shown.
Recommended Motion(s):
Recommend approving Taylor Farms to transfer15 acres from NW NW 12-17-5E to SE S12-17-7E, Dodge County. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
()
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2.A.2. Irrigation Clarification in Non-Hydrologically Connected Area (Normal Development Area)
Rationale:
Sandra Muhle is requesting clarification of a tract of land that she is now the primary owner. The tract land is in the N NW 17-18-1E, Platte County and north of Columbus Lakeview Schools; a map is attached. The well located in this tract is shown on DWEE website G-019000 as an active irrigation well drilled in 1956. This well is physically not there as investigated, but the map shows 35.11 irrigated acres. NRD staff could not find any record of irrigated taxes being paid on this tract of land. Sandra has applied for a variance, but is this an expansion of acres or a new well and how many acres does she need to apply for?
Shown are the rules to determine irrigated acres. The NRD does not have a policy once the acres are certified to decertify the acres. Staff handled the issue with parties prior to the Committee meeting. A new well variance has been applied for, which will be reviewed in September. No existing irrigated acres will be shown on this tract and paperwork on the old well will be filled out to decommission the existing well. Historic Irrigated acre shall mean: (1) in stay management areas any acre that is certified as such pursuant to rules and regulations of the District and that has actually been supplied water through irrigation works, mechanisms, or facilities (a) for two of the last ten years prior to the effective date of the stay management area and two years of the most recent ten year period subsequent to the effective date of the stay management area or, (b) at least one of the last two years prior to the effective date of the stay management area, or (c) land that is defined as sub-irrigated, or (d) land that was previously irrigated two of the last ten years prior to the effective date of the stay management area and two of the last most recent ten year period subsequent to the effective date of the stay management area was enrolled in a federal conservation program; (2) in non-stay management areas, any acre that is certified as such pursuant to rules and regulations of the District and that has actually been supplied water through irrigation works, mechanisms, or facilities (a) for two of the last ten years, or (b) at least one of the last two years, or (c) land that is defined as sub-irrigated, or (d) land that was previously irrigated but during two of the most recent ten year period was enrolled in a federal conservation program; (3) The District may grant an exception for good cause shown;
Attachments:
()
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2.A.3. Transfer Request in the Restricted Development Areas
Rationale:
Greg Fujan would like to transfer acres within the restricted area and SQS 1. Robert Shanahan has agreed to give up 40 acres in the SE SE 21-15-5E and NE NE 28-15-5 to Greg; which will transfer the acres to the SW SW 28-15-5E. These sites are on the eastern side of the SQS #1 management area.
The Committee commented that as this is moving acres away from the middle of SQS 1, this should be a benefit. Greg commented that the water levels have stayed steady over the years from the well he plans on utilizing. Attached is a map of the locations along with the NRD management map.
Recommended Motion(s):
Recommend allowing the transfer of 40 acres for Greg Fujan from Robert Shanahan located in the SE SE 21-15-5E and NE NE 28-15-5 to SW SW 28-15-5E, Saunders County. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
()
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2.A.4. Well Permit Program
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2.A.5. Well Permits Requested for Duck Ponds
Rationale:
Kalend McCurdy is requesting 2 high-capacity wells for duck ponds that will pump 300 GPM for the SE NE Section 34-17N-3E and NW SW Section 35-17N-3E, Butler County, across the river south of Schuyler. A map is attached showing the 2 locations with the plan to fill 10 acre ponds for habitat.
The Committee wants to make sure that these wells do not interfere with other wells in the area and if complaints are received, the NRD has the right to shut the wells down. The wells can only be used from September 1 to May 31 per policy.
Recommended Motion(s):
Recommend approving 2 high capacity well for Kalend McCurdy in the SE NE Section 34-17N-3E and NW SW Section 35-17N-3E, Butler County for the purpose of a duck pond. Stipulation on the well permits are; if interference complaints are received the wells will need to be shut down, installation of PVC tube for water levels measurements and a water flow meter. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
()
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2.A.6. Dewatering well permits
Rationale:
Paul Boyd is requesting 4 de-watering permits in SW SW S36-18N-7E for the purpose of excavating a 2.5 acre pond. This site is NW of Fremont and Hwy 30. From spring water level measurements from NRD GWEL wells, the water levels are 7.2 and 7.39 feet below the surface in this area.
The committee wanted more information as to where the water would be draining, have neighbors been notified and the purpose of the pond. No action was taken on these permits. Map and graph attached.
Attachments:
()
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2.A.7. Change of Water Use Policy
Rationale:
Attached is a draft policy for a change in water use, the current DWEE modification form, and what the state form could be changed to.
Attachments:
()
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2.A.8. Re-Certification of Irrigated Acres
Rationale:
A map shows the certification of acres that will need to be rectified.
The committee discussed the acres affected by the highway and whether the producers control the acres or the State Dept. of Transportation.
Attachments:
()
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2.A.9. Cost Share Programs
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2.A.10. Lower Platte River Basin Water Management Plan Coalition (LPRBC)
Rationale:
The Board Meeting is on April 15, starting at 10 am in the NRD Board Room at Wahoo.
Copy of report is attached.
Attachments:
()
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2.B. CHEMIGATION
Rationale:
For 2026 we have 146 renewals and 7 new permit applications for a current total of 153. Inspections for 0 renewal permits have been completed. |
||||||||||||||||
|
2.C. GROUND WATER ENERGY LEVELS
Rationale:
Staff is over half done on spring water levels.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2.D. GROUND WATER QUALITY SAMPLING
Rationale:
Linwood Sample Results
Nitrate Results Above MCL: 11.8, 16.7, 13.2, 21.1, 16.5, 12.124 samples collected, 19 Nitrate Samples, 3 Uranium, 2 Pesticide Pesticide Results: None Detected Uranium Results Above MCL (all): 116 ug/L, 30.9 ug/L, 91.4 ug/L YSI -Sent in one of our three YSI instruments to be serviced. The last one was sent in to be serviced in July 2025. The state sends theirs in yearly to ensure they are as accurate as possible. Quote total - $1,180.21 Phase Area Rules & Regs -Updated recommendations/ proposals will be brought to the next committee.
Recommended Motion(s):
Recommend approving the invoice from Fondriest Environmental Inc for $1,180.21 for the purpose of updating the NRD in field water parameter meter. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
3. GROUND WATER PROGRAMS
|
||||||||||||||||
|
3.A. DECOMMISSIONED WELL PROGRAM
|
||||||||||||||||
|
3.A.1. Well Estimates
Rationale:
2 new wells has been reviewed and approved for decommissioning since the last Committee meeting.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
3.A.2. Plugged Wells
Rationale:
# wells have been plugged, reviewed, and ready for cost share payment approval this month.
Recommended Motion(s):
Recommend to approve payment to Mary Norton Trust for 1 well decommissioning for $1,073. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
3.B. LOWER PLATTE NORTH NRD GROUND WATER STUDIES
|
||||||||||||||||
|
3.B.1. Phase Area Update
Rationale:
Flow meter cost-share
Timothy Rickert - 1 flow meter - $1,000 David Hahn - 1 flow meter - $1,000 Jeremy Theilen - 1 flow meter - $1,000 Roger Wilshusen - 1 flow meter - $1,000
Recommended Motion(s):
Recommend flow meter cost share payments to Timothy Rickert - $1,000, David Hahn - $1,000, Jeremy Theilen - $1,000 and Roger Wilshusen - $1,000. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
3.B.2. Eastern Nebraska Water Resources Assessment (ENWRA)
|
||||||||||||||||
|
3.B.3. Lower Platte River Consortium
Rationale:
The group met on March 27 and decided to send out a news release concerning the drought. Some of the concerns are the amount of moisture received this winter and snow pack in the Rocky Mountains.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
3.C. NEW MONITORING WELLS
Rationale:
Newman Grove Monitoring Well Bids
We had two well drillers interested in the project, however, one was unable to get his in due to family circumstances.
Recommended Motion(s):
It was recommended to proceed with the bid offered by Dvorak Well Drilling and to not exceed $53,000. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
()
|
||||||||||||||||
|
3.C.1. NEWMAN GROVE CSD TEST HOLES
Rationale:
For the Newman Grove Monitoring Well Project, CSD is planning on digging the test holes. Attached is the agreement with CSD, and the estimate for a 400-foot test hole is $5,000. We need a motion to proceed.
Recommended Motion(s):
It was recommended to pay the Conservation Survey Division in the amount of $5,000 for the 400 foot test hole to be dug at the Newman Grove Monitoring Well Site on May 11th. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
()
|
||||||||||||||||
|
3.D. SOURCE WATER PROTECTION
|
||||||||||||||||
|
3.D.1. TRANSDUCER AGREEMENT
Rationale:
Attached is the quote for transducers with the purpose of monitoring water quantity within Wellhead Protection Areas. This will be fully reimbursed from the transducer agreement in the amount of $$9,309.18.
Motion is recommended to proceed.
Recommended Motion(s):
It was recommended to pay InSitu the quoted amount of $9,309.18 for the three transducers to be placed in Wellhead Protection Areas. Passed with a motion by Board Member #1 and a second by Board Member #2.
Attachments:
()
|
||||||||||||||||
|
3.D.2. MALMO WHP
Rationale:
The Contaminant Management Strategy Guide was submitted to DWEE. They are currently finishing up the Wellhead Protection Plan. Open houses are the next step to be completed once DWEE is done.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
3.E. SCORING SHEETS AND WATER QUANTITY PROJECT
Rationale:
Spheros (formerly LRE) will be giving a progress update report on the scoring sheet and water quantity project LPN contracted in January 2026. They will also present a modeling suggestion as a tool to utilize with variances and well permits.
An abbreviated presentation was given to show the progress of the scoring sheets and to present the idea of a groundwater model to assist with well permits and variances. An invoice is attached for $2,607.25 for the contracted work.
Attachments:
()
|
||||||||||||||||
|
4. SURFACE WATER PROGRAMS
|
||||||||||||||||
|
5. OTHER
|
||||||||||||||||
|
5.A. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC
|