Meeting Agenda
|
---|
1. Open Meeting
|
2. Roll Call
|
3. Items of Business
|
3.A. Consider proposals for Well #5 repairs
|
3.B. 15th Street paving opinion of cost and assessment for possible paving project
|
3.C. Consider Resolution 2024-09 25 mph speed limit on South Arizona in City limits
|
3.D. Consider Allo Assets Pole Attachment Agreement
|
3.E. Consider the Krupicka Administrative Subdivision
|
4. Officers' Reports
|
5. Adjournment
|
Agenda Item Details
Reload Your Meeting
|
|||
---|---|---|---|
Meeting: | May 21, 2024 at 5:00 PM - Public Works Committee Meeting | ||
Subject: |
1. Open Meeting
|
||
Rationale:
|
|||
Subject: |
2. Roll Call
|
||
Rationale:
|
|||
Subject: |
3. Items of Business
|
||
Rationale:
|
|||
Subject: |
3.A. Consider proposals for Well #5 repairs
|
||
Discussion:
City Administrator, Tom Ourada, explained how this would normally be bid, but it needs to be repaired. The survey has been done, but things still need to be done.
|
|||
Action(s):
|
|||
Attachments:
|
|||
Subject: |
3.B. 15th Street paving opinion of cost and assessment for possible paving project
|
||
Discussion:
City Administrator, Tom Ourada, explained the costs of each project. Tom asked for a 35ft street, so it could be consistent and asses at 32ft and not asses for demolition. It would be assessed at 32ft, but constructed at 35ft, with the City pickup the difference. Tom did state to consider partial sidewalks, with sidewalks on both sides of 15th Street. The City would still have the majority of the cost. For property owners, it would be a little over $900. The City will send out assessment estimates to the property owners. Tom stated that going the extra width and the City funding the demo and portion of the sidewalk cost is a good approach. No motion is needed at this time, to allow time to get feedback from property owners.
|
|||
Subject: |
3.C. Consider Resolution 2024-09 25 mph speed limit on South Arizona in City limits
|
||
Discussion:
City Administrator, Tom Ourada, discussed an action taken previously. This speed limit would go to the end of the Catholic cemetery. This is considered to help drivers slow down in that area to not pick up too much dust and be respectful during a funeral.
|
|||
Action(s):
|
|||
Attachments:
|
|||
Subject: |
3.D. Consider Allo Assets Pole Attachment Agreement
|
||
Discussion:
City Administrator, Tom Ourada, explained this is the same agreement the City has with Windstream. Allo is aware that it is $6 a pole.
|
|||
Action(s):
|
|||
Attachments:
|
|||
Subject: |
3.E. Consider the Krupicka Administrative Subdivision
|
||
Discussion:
Dave Solheim, the trustee of Robert Krupicka, discussed how Robert had many properties in Crete and thinks that they are useful properties. Dave is starting to prepare and offer on the market to sell the properties, as vacant houses and lots could have potential. This Administrative Subdivision relates to a property that has renters living there. The idea is to split off the vacant lot beside it and sell it separately. When the property was being surveyed, it came out to be that there was an alley there, and the garage encroaches into the alley about 2ft. To resolve this issue, the alley would need to be vacated to allow the subdivision to split this property into two lots.
|
|||
Action(s):
|
|||
Attachments:
|
|||
Subject: |
4. Officers' Reports
|
||
Rationale:
|
|||
Action(s):
|
|||
Subject: |
5. Adjournment
|