|
Meeting Agenda
|
|---|
|
1. Open Meeting
|
|
2. Roll Call
|
|
3. Items of Business
|
|
3.A. Approve December 29th, 2025 Planning Commission Minutes
|
|
3.B. Public Hearing to hear testimony in favor of and in opposition to and to answer questions in relation to the proposed one and six year Street Improvement Plan
|
|
3.C. Consider the one and six year Street Improvement Plan
|
|
3.D. Consider changing the Planning Commission meeting date in February
|
|
4. Officers' Reports
|
|
5. Adjournment
|
|
Agenda Item Details
Reload Your Meeting
|
||
|---|---|---|
| Meeting: | January 26, 2026 at 7:00 PM - Planning Commission Meeting | |
| Subject: |
1. Open Meeting
|
|
|
Rationale:
In accordance with Nebraska law, a copy of the Open Meetings Act can be found in the back of the council chambers. Items listed on the agenda may be considered in any order. |
||
| Subject: |
2. Roll Call
|
|
|
Rationale:
Attendance of Planning Commission members will be recorded to determine the presence of a quorum for official actions. |
||
| Subject: |
3. Items of Business
|
|
|
Rationale:
The Planning Commission may take action to hear testimony in favor of or in opposition to, discuss/limit discussion and take action to approve or disapprove a recommendation to the City Council on any matter presented under this title. |
||
| Subject: |
3.A. Approve December 29th, 2025 Planning Commission Minutes
|
|
|
Discussion:
Scott Kuncl motioned and Justin Kozisek seconded to approve the December 29th, 2025 Planning Commission minutes.
Dave Jurena: Aye, Justin Kozisek: Aye, Scott Kuncl: Aye, Jennifer Robison: Aye Jeff:Wenz: Aye, Jay Quinn: Aye, Ryan Jindara: Aye Aye: 7, No: 0 |
||
|
Attachments:
|
||
| Subject: |
3.B. Public Hearing to hear testimony in favor of and in opposition to and to answer questions in relation to the proposed one and six year Street Improvement Plan
|
|
|
Discussion:
Scott Kuncl motioned and Jay Quinn seconded to Open the Public Hearing at 7:01 p.m. to hear testimony in favor of and in opposition to and to answer questions in relation to the proposed one and six year Street Improvement Plan
Dave Jurena: Aye, Justin Kozisek: Aye, Scott Kuncl: Aye, Jennifer Robison: Aye Jeff:Wenz: Aye, Jay Quinn: Aye, Ryan Jindara: Aye Aye: 7, No: 0 City Administrator Tom Ourada stated that it is required by law to do a one and six year Street Improvement Plan and it has to be submitted to the state by a Certified Street Superintendent, which is what he is. Failure to do would withheld state funds which would be about $900,000. You also can't get federal aid on projects that are not on the one and six-year plan. Ourada went through and explained that he made several changes on the one year plan. One was to add a planning component for an elevated not at grade crossing on Main and Linden Ave. Ourada explained that the last two north side gap paving projects he pulled from the one to put on the six year plan. Ourada stated that most of the projects with the exception of a couple would involve some type of state or federal aid or grants. Ourada explained the six-year plan and stated that the major change on that would be the construction of the overpass and pedestrian crossing. Ourada explained that the City is applying for multiple grants to help with the feasibility study and then with the construction of the project. The Planning Commission members discussed the high costs of studies needed to complete projects. Planning Commission member Justin Kozisek asked Ourada about other street projects such as 15th Street and Boswell Ave and how they could be improved. Ourada explained that letters were mailed out to property owners on 15th Street and all but one property owner were against the paving project. Ourada also explained that Boswell Ave had been on the plan years ago but the Planning Commission decided to remove it. Scott Kuncl motioned and Justin Kozisek seconded to Close the Public Hearing at 7:34 p.m. to hear testimony in favor of and in opposition to and to answer questions in relation to the proposed one and six year Street Improvement Plan Dave Jurena: Aye, Justin Kozisek: Aye, Scott Kuncl: Aye, Jennifer Robison: Aye Jeff:Wenz: Aye, Jay Quinn: Aye, Ryan Jindara: Aye Aye: 7, No: 0 |
||
|
Attachments:
|
||
| Subject: |
3.C. Consider the one and six year Street Improvement Plan
|
|
|
Discussion:
Scott Kuncl motioned and Jay Quinn seconded to recommend to the City Council the proposed one and six-year Street Improvement Plan
Dave Jurena: Aye, Justin Kozisek: Aye, Scott Kuncl: Aye, Jennifer Robison: Aye Jeff:Wenz: Aye, Jay Quinn: Aye, Ryan Jindara: Aye Aye: 7, No: 0 |
||
|
Attachments:
|
||
| Subject: |
3.D. Consider changing the Planning Commission meeting date in February
|
|
|
Discussion:
Jennifer Robison motioned and Jay Quinn seconded to change the Planning Commission meeting date and time in February to February 16th, 2026 at 6:00 p.m.
Dave Jurena: Aye, Justin Kozisek: Aye, Scott Kuncl: Aye, Jennifer Robison: Aye Jeff:Wenz: Aye, Jay Quinn: Aye, Ryan Jindara: Aye Aye: 7, No: 0 |
||
| Subject: |
4. Officers' Reports
|
|
|
Rationale:
Reports may be given by Department Heads, other Committees and Commission members concerning current operations of the City. Questions may be asked and answered. No action can be taken by the Planning Commission on matters presented under this title except to answer any question posed and to refer the matter for further action. |
||
| Subject: |
5. Adjournment
|
|
|
Rationale:
The Planning Commission will review the above matters and take such actions as they deem appropriate. The Planning Commission may enter into closed session to discuss any matter on this agenda when it is determined by the Commission that it is clearly necessary for protection of the public interest or the prevention of needless injury to the reputation of an individual and if such and individual has not requested a public meeting, or as otherwise allowed by law. Any closed session shall be limited to the subject matter for which the closed session was called. If the motion to close passes, then the presiding officer immediately prior to the closed session shall restate on the record the limitation of the subject matter of the closed session. |
||
|
Discussion:
The meeting adjourned at 7:47 p.m.
|
||